Supreme Court Halts Execution After Illness Claim - NBCNews.com
Lockett's death brought more attention to the controversy over state policies that keep their lethal-injection suppliers — often less-regulated compounding pharmacies — anonymous.
Bucklew's challenge cited Missouri's drug secrecy but was more focused on his vascular disorder, which his lawyers argued would "almost inevitably lead to a bloody, prolonged and excruciating execution."
A lower court ruled that if Bucklew wanted to oppose a shot of pentobarbital, he had to propose a more humane method for his own execution.
But the appeals panel that issued the first stay said that wasn't necessary since he was not making a broad challenge to the protocol — only arguing that his unique medical condition would make a lethal injection cruel in his case.
The judges also faulted Missouri for failing to carry out a "meaningful assessment" of how its protocol might be affected by his illness.
In an interview last week, Bucklew told the Associated Press that he feared the execution would go wrong.
"I'm worried it could be painful," he said in a phone interview from prison.
"I'm worried about being brain-dead. I understand the family (of the victim) wants closure, but we're victimizing my family here, too."
The children of Bucklew's victim, Michael Sanders, plan to be in the death chamber if the execution takes place.
Sanders was killed because he opened his home to Bucklew's ex-girlfriend after she was repeatedly threatened by Bucklew. Bucklew later escaped from jail and attacked the former girlfriend's mother with a hammer.
"It's up to God what God does with him," Sanders' mother, Dorothy, told the Southeast Missourian newspaper last week.
"I don't forgive the guy, because I don't think I could ever do that, even though I'm supposed to. I'll just be glad when it's over with and leave the rest of it up to God and let him take care of it."